Design Optimization and Operating Performance of S-CO2 Brayton Cycle under Fluctuating Ambient Temperature and Diverse Power Demand Scenarios

  • YANG Jingze ,
  • YANG Zhen ,
  • DUAN Yuanyuan
Expand
  • Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of MOE, Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Online published: 2024-01-16

Supported by

This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 3202014).

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023

Abstract

The supercritical CO2 (S-CO2) Brayton cycle is expected to replace steam cycle in the application of solar power tower system due to the attractive potential to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Since the concentrated solar power plant with thermal energy storage is usually located in drought area and used to provide a dispatchable power output, the S-CO2 Brayton cycle has to operate under fluctuating ambient temperature and diverse power demand scenarios. In addition, the cycle design condition will directly affect the off-design performance. In this work, the combined effects of design condition, and distributions of ambient temperature and power demand on the cycle operating performance are analyzed, and the off-design performance maps are proposed for the first time. A cycle design method with feedback mechanism of operating performance under varied ambient temperature and power demand is introduced innovatively. Results show that the low design value of compressor inlet temperature is not conductive to efficient operation under low loads and sufficient output under high ambient temperatures. The average yearly efficiency is most affected by the average power demand, while the load cover factor is significantly influenced by the average ambient temperature. With multi-objective optimization, the optimal solution of designed compressor inlet temperature is close to the minimum value of 35°C in Delingha with low ambient temperature, while reaches 44.15°C in Daggett under the scenario of high ambient temperature, low average power demand, long duration and large value of peak load during the peak temperature period. If the cycle designed with compressor inlet temperature of 35°C instead of 44.15°C in Daggett under light industry power demand, the reduction of load cover factor will reach 0.027, but the average yearly efficiency can barely be improved.

Cite this article

YANG Jingze , YANG Zhen , DUAN Yuanyuan . Design Optimization and Operating Performance of S-CO2 Brayton Cycle under Fluctuating Ambient Temperature and Diverse Power Demand Scenarios[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2024 , 33(1) : 190 -206 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-023-1839-2

References

[1] Lilliestam J., Barradi T., Caldes N., et al., Policies to keep and expand the option of concentrating solar power for dispatchable renewable electricity. Energy Policy, 2018, 116: 193–197.
[2] Tan Q.L., Mei S.F., Ye Q., et al., Optimization model of a combined wind-PV-thermal dispatching system under carbon emissions trading in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 391–404.
[3] Gu Y.J., Xu J., Chen D.C., et al., Overall review of peak shaving for coal-fired power units in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 723–731.
[4] Zeng M., Duan J.H., Wang L., et al., Orderly grid connection of renewable energy generation in China: Management mode, existing problems and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 14–28.
[5] Du E.S., Zhang N., Hodge B.M., et al., Economic justification of concentrating solar power in high renewable energy penetrated power systems. Applied Energy, 2018, 222: 649–661.
[6] Wang K., Li M.J., Zhang Z.D., et al., Evaluation of alternative eutectic salt as heat transfer fluid for solar power tower coupling a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle from the viewpoint of system-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123472.
[7] Crespi F., Gavagnin G., Sanchez D., et al., Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review. Applied Energy, 2017, 195: 152–183.
[8] Wang K., Li M.J., Guo J.Q., et al., A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants. Applied Energy, 2018, 212: 109–121.
[9] Gao W., Yao M.Y., Chen Y., et al., Performance of S-CO2 Brayton cycle and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) combined system considering the diurnal distribution of solar radiation. Journal of Thermal Science, 2019, 28: 463–471.
[10] Chen Y., Xu D.J., Chen Z., et al., Performance analysis and evaluation of a supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle coupled with an absorption refrigeration cycle. Journal of Thermal Science, 2020, 29: 1036–1052.
[11] Ehsan M.M., Duniam S., Li J.S., et al., A comprehensive thermal assessment of dry cooled supercritical CO2 power cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 166: 114645.
[12] Yang J.Z., Yang Z., Duan Y.Y., Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system. Energy, 2020, 201: 117676.
[13] Dostal V., Driscoll M.J., Hejzlar P., et al., A supercritical CO2 gas turbine power cycle for next-generation nuclear reactors. 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 2002.
[14] Luu M.T., Milani D., McNaughton R., et al., Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems. Energy, 2017, 124: 752–771.
[15] Osorio J.D., Hovsapian R., Ordonez J.C., Dynamic analysis of concentrated solar supercritical CO2-based power generation closed-loop cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 93: 920–934.
[16] Pan C.A., Dinter F., Combination of PV and central receiver CSP plants for base load power generation in South Africa. Solar Energy, 2017, 146: 379–388.
[17] Ding Z.Y., Hou H.J., Yu G., et al., Performance analysis of a wind-solar hybrid power generation system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 181: 223–234.
[18] Zhai R.R., Liu H.T., Chen Y., et al., The daily and annual technical-economic analysis of the thermal storage PV-CSP system in two dispatch strategies. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 154: 56–67.
[19] Liu X.X., Xu Z., Xie Y.C., et al., CO2-based mixture working fluids used for the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle: Thermodynamic evaluation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 162: 114226.
[20] Singh R., Kearney M.P., Manzie C., Extremum-seeking control of a supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar thermal power plant. Energy, 2013, 60: 380–387.
[21] Dyreby J.J., Klein S.A., Nellis G.F., et al., Modeling off-design and part-load performance of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles. ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 2013, V008T34A014.
[22] Couso G.B., Vicencio R.B., Padilla R.V., et al., Dynamic model of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles driven by concentrated solar power. Proceedings of the ASME 11th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, 2017.
[23] Alfani D., Astolfi M., Binotti M., et al., Optimization of the part-load operation strategy of sCO2 power plants. Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, 2019.
[24] Wang X.R., Li X.X., Li Q.B., et al., Performance of a solar thermal power plant with direct air-cooled supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle under off-design conditions. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114359.
[25] Yang J.Z., Yang Z., Duan Y.Y., Part-load performance analysis and comparison of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 214: 112832.
[26] Dyreby J.J., Modeling the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with recompression. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, 2014.
[27] Duniam S., Veeraragavan A., Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power. Energy, 2019, 187: 115992.
[28] Calle A.D.L., Bayon A., Too Y.C.S., Impact of ambient temperature on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle in arid locations: Finding the optimal design conditions. Energy, 2018, 153: 1016–1027.
[29] Yang J.Z., Yang Z., Duan Y.Y., Load matching and techno-economic analysis of CSP plant with S-CO2 Brayton cycle in CSP-PV-wind hybrid system. Energy, 2021, 223: 120016.
[30] Crespi F., Sanchez D., Sanchez T., et al., Capital cost assessment of concentrated solar power plants based on supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of the ASME, 2019, 141(7): 071011.
[31] Yang J.Z., Li J., Yang Z., et al., Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar organic Rankine cycle operating with stable output. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 187: 459–471.
[32] Zhu H.H., Wang K., He Y.L., Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system. Energy, 2017, 140: 144–157.
[33] Neises T., Turchi C., A comparison of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle configurations with an emphasis on CSP applications. Energy Procedia, 2014, 49: 1187–1196.
[34] Duniam S., Jahn I., Hooman K., et al., Comparison of direct and indirect natural draft dry cooling tower cooling of the sCO2 Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 130: 1070–1080.
[35] John H., Holland, adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
[36] Xi H., Li M.J., Xu C., et al., Parametric optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery using genetic algorithm. Energy, 2013, 58: 473–482.
[37] Wang J.F., Sun Z.X., Dai Y.P., et al., Parametric optimization design for supercritical CO2 power cycle using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(4): 1317–1324.
[38] González-Roubaud E., Pérez-Osorio D., Prieto C., Review of commercial thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants: Steam vs. molten salts. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 80: 133–148.
[39] Lemmon E.W., Huber M.L., McLinden M.O., NIST standard reference database 23: reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties-REFPROP, version 9.1. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program, 2013.
[40] Wang J.F., Yan Z.Q., Zhao P., et al., Off-design performance analysis of a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 80: 150–157.
[41] Chen H., Baines N.C., The aerodynamic loading of radial and mixed-flow turbines. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1994, 36(1): 63–79.
[42] Wright S.A., Conboy T.M., Parma E.J., et al., Summary of the Sandia supercritical CO2 development program. Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Boulder, CO, USA, 2011.
[43] Wright S.A., Radel R.F., Vernon M.E., et al., Operation and analysis of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Sandia Report SAND2010-0171, 2010.
[44] Patnode A.M., Simulation and performance evaluation of parabolic trough solar power plants. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, 2006.
[45] Lopes R.A., Martins J., Aelenei D., et al., A cooperative net zero energy community to improve load matching. Renewable Energy, 2016, 93: 1–13.
[46] Hu S.Z., Li J., Yang F.B., et al., How to design organic Rankine cycle system under fluctuating ambient temperature: A multi-objective approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 224: 113331.
[47] Starke A.R., Cardemil J.M., Escobar R., et al., Multi-objective optimization of hybrid CSP+PV system using genetic algorithm. Energy, 2018, 147: 490–503.
[48] National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Solar Advisor Model. <https://sam.nrel.gov/>.
Outlines

/