Cloud-Based Optimal Control of Individual Borehole Heat Exchangers in a Geothermal Field

  • STOFFEL Phillip ,
  • KüMPEL Alexander ,
  • MüLLER Dirk
Expand
  • RWTH Aachen University, E.ON Energy Research Center, Institute for Energy Efficient Buildings and Indoor Climate, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Online published: 2023-12-01

Supported by

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), promotional reference 03ETW006A.

Copyright

The Author(s) 2022

Abstract

Integrating renewable energy sources is a crucial component in reducing CO2 emissions in the building sector. In particular, shallow geothermal energy is expected to play a significant role in the regenerative energy supply of buildings. An effective control strategy for the geothermal field is crucial to reduce the overall energy consumption. This paper analyzes the benefits of controlling an existing field's individual borehole heat exchangers (BHE) using nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) and moving horizon estimation. The considered geothermal field consists of 41 BHEs and is used for heating and cooling. Each BHE is equipped with temperature sensors for in- and outflow and has individually controllable valves, while a central hydraulic pump feeds all BHEs. The sensor measurements are accessed through a cloud platform, enabling also set point writing for the pump speed and the valve positions. To control the BHEs individually, we propose a two-stage process. In the calibration stage, a moving horizon estimator estimates the actual borehole and ground temperatures for each BHE. In the second stage, first, a nonlinear model predictive controller optimizes the number of active BHEs necessary to meet the buildings’ energy demand. With the estimated ground temperatures as a basis, it is determined which BHEs shall be (de)-activated. The active BHEs are fed with a fixed volume flow of 24 L/min to ensure turbulent heat transfer. To reduce the power usage of the pumps, an optimal control problem based on a simple hydraulic model of the geothermal field is used. The methodology is analyzed through simulations first and then validated experimentally. The results show that half or more of the BHEs could be deactivated most of the time, leading to 67% savings in electricity consumption by the hydraulic pump.
The experimental validation confirms the high energy saving potential of the proposed methodology, reducing the consumption of electrical energy by 71%. Additionally, the deactivated BHEs regenerate faster and improve the field’s long-term behavior. In conclusion, the proposed strategy improves the short and long-term performance of the geothermal field.

Cite this article

STOFFEL Phillip , KüMPEL Alexander , MüLLER Dirk . Cloud-Based Optimal Control of Individual Borehole Heat Exchangers in a Geothermal Field[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022 , 31(5) : 1253 -1265 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1639-0

References

[1] EGEC Geothermal Market Report 2017 - EGEC - European Geothermal Energy Council https://www.egec.org/media-publications/egec-geothermal-market-report-2017/. (Accessed on 8 February 2021).
[2] Luo J., Zhao H., Jia J., Xiang W., Rohn J., Blum P., Study on operation management of borehole heat exchangers for a large-scale hybrid ground source heat pump system in China. Energy, 2017, 123: 340–352.
[3] Fan R., Gao Y., Hua L., Deng X., Shi J., Thermal performance and operation strategy optimization for a practical hybrid ground-source heat-pump system. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 78: 238–247.
[4] Laferrière A., Cimmino M., Model predictive control applied to residential self-assisted ground source heat pumps. Proceedings of the IGSHPA Research Track 2018. International Ground Source Heat Pump Association, 2018. DOI: 10.22488/okstate.18.000034
[5] Gultekin A., Aydin M., Sisman A., Thermal performance analysis of multiple borehole heat exchangers. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 122: 544–551.
[6] Drgoňa J., Arroyo J., Cupeiro Figueroa I., Blum D., Arendt K., Kim D., et al., All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings. Annual Reviews in Control, 2020, 50: 190–232.
[7] Verhelst C., Model predictive control of ground coupled heat pump systems for office buildings. KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, 2012.
[8] Picard D., Modeling, optimal control and HVAC design of large buildings using ground source heat pump systems. KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, 2017.
[9] Cupeiro Figueroa I., Cimmino M., Helsen L., A methodology for long-term model predictive control of hybrid geothermal systems: The shadow-cost formulation. Energies, 2020, 13(23): 6203.
[10] Atam E., Helsen L., Ground-coupled heat pumps: Part 1 – Literature review and research challenges in modeling and optimal control. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 1653–1667.
[11] Cimmino M., Pygfunction: an open-source toolbox for the evaluation of thermal response factors for geothermal borehole fields. Proceedings of eSim, 2018, the 10th conference of IBPSA-Canada. ISBN 978-2-921145-88-6.
[12] Cazorla Marín A., Modelling and experimental validation of an innovative coaxial helical borehole heat exchanger for a dual source heat pump system. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain. 2019.
[13] Cupeiro Figueroa I., Cimmino M., Drgoňa J., Helsen L., Fluid temperature predictions of geothermal borefields using load estimations via state observers. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2021, 14(1): 1–19.
[14] Cupeiro Figueroa I., Picard D., Helsen L., Short-term modeling of hybrid geothermal systems for Model Predictive Control. Energy and Buildings, 2020, 215: 109884.
[15] Weeratunge H., Narsilio G., de Hoog J., Dunstall S., Halgamuge S., Model predictive control for a solar assisted ground source heat pump system. Energy, 2018, 152: 974–984.
[16] Drgoňa J., Picard D., Helsen L., Cloud-based implementation of white-box model predictive control for a GEOTABS office building: A field test demonstration. Journal of Process Control, 2020, 88: 63–77.
[17] Atam E., Patteeuw D., Antonov S.P., Helsen L., Optimal control approaches for analysis of energy use minimization of hybrid ground-coupled heat pump systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2445851
[18] de Paly M., Hecht-Méndez J., Beck M., Blum P., Zell A., Bayer P., Optimization of energy extraction for closed shallow geothermal systems using linear programming. Geothermics, 2012, 43: 57–65.
[19] Hecht-Méndez J., de Paly M., Beck M., Bayer P., Optimization of energy extraction for vertical closed-loop geothermal systems considering groundwater flow. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 66: 1–10.
[20] Bayer P., de Paly M., Beck M., Strategic optimization of borehole heat exchanger field for seasonal geothermal heating and cooling. Applied Energy, 2014, 136: 445–453.
[21] Bayer P., Beck M., de Paly M., Automatic optimization of multiple borehole heat exchanger fields. Renewable Energy in the Service of Mankind Vol I, 2015.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17777-9_22
[22] Nordell B., Andersson O., Rydell L., Liuzzo-Scorpo A., Long-term performance of the HT-BTES in Emmaboda, Sweden. Conference: Greenstock 2015, Beijing, China, 2015.
[23] Andersson O., Rydell L., Algotsson T., Efficient usage of waste heat by applying a seasonal energy storage (BTES) at ITT Water & Wastewater AB, Emmaboda, Sweden. Proceedings of Effstock 2009, the 11th International Conference on Energy Storage, Stockholm, June 14–17, 2009.
[24] Futterer J., Constantin A., Schmidt M., Streblow R., Muller D., Kosmatopoulos E., A multifunctional demonstration bench for advanced control research in buildings; Monitoring, control, and interface system. IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE, Vienna, Austria, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2013.6700068
[25] Bode G., Fütterer J., Müller D., Mode and storage load based control of a complex building system with a geothermal field. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 158: 1337–1345.
[26] Eskilson P., Claesson J., Simulation model for thermally interacting heat extraction boreholes. Numerical Heat Transfer, 1988, 13(2): 149–165.
[27] Kühl P., Diehl M., Kraus T., Schlöder J.P., Bock H.G., A real-time algorithm for moving horizon state and parameter estimation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2011, 35(1): 71–83.
[28] Andersson J.A.E., Gillis J., Horn G., Rawlings J.B., Diehl M., CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control. Mathematical Programming Computation, 2019, 11(1): 1–36.
[29] Gurobi Optimization LLC, Gurobi optimizer reference manual. 2022. https://www.gurobi.com
[30] Laszczyk P., Simplified modeling of liquid-liquid heat exchangers for use in control systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 119: 140–155.
[31] Hart W.E., Laird C.D., Watson J.P., Woodruff D.L., Hackebeil G.A., Nicholson B.L. et al., Pyomo— optimization modeling in python. Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[32] Wächter A., Biegler L.T., On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 2006, 106(1): 25–57.
[33] VDI-Gesellschaft Energie und Umwelt, Thermal use of the underground - Ground source heat pump systems. Norm: VDI 4640 Blatt 2, 2019.
https://www.vdi.de/richtlinien/details/vdi-4640-blatt-2-thermal-use-of-the-underground-ground-source-heat-pump-systems
[34] Stellventile für die Prozessregelung – Teil 2–1: Durchflusskapazität, 2012. Industrial-process control valves - Part 2-1: Flow capacity - Sizing equations for fluid flow under installed conditions (International Norm IEC 60534-2-1: 2011); German version EN 60534-2-1: 2011
https://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/normenausschuesse/dke/veroeffentlichungen/wdc-beuth:din21:145144261
Outlines

/