Aerothermodynamics

Computational Study on the Boundary Layer Suction Effects in the Supersonic Compressor Flow with a Bowed Blade

  • CAO Zhiyuan ,
  • SONG Cheng ,
  • GAO Xi ,
  • ZHANG Xiang ,
  • LIU Bo
Expand
  • School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Online published: 2023-11-30

Supported by

This research was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51806174, 51741601), National Science and Technology Major Project (No. J2019-II-0011-0031) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51790512).

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

Abstract

Flow control methodologies have been widely used to eliminating flow separation and increasing the blade load in axial compressor. Aiming at revealing the flow mechanism of coupled bowed blading and boundary layer suction in a supersonic compressor cascade, a cascade with a diffusion coefficient of 0.62 is numerically presented. First of all, according to the available experimental data, the numerical method was validated; then, different bowed blading effects on flow field in detail were investigated; at last, based on the flow physics of purely bowed blading, the positively bowed blade was coupled with boundary layer suction on blade suction surface, whereas the negatively bowed blade was coupled with endwall suction. For coupled control method, influence mechanism on flow field, especially on the shock structure was revealed, and different aspect ratios of coupled control method were investigated as well. Results showed that the coupled positively bowed blading and suction surface suction can eliminate the flow separation effectively. Compared with that of baseline supersonic cascade, the total pressure loss coefficient of the coupled scheme was reduced by 37.4% at most. At mid-span, the shock moved downstream and the single shock was separated to a dual-shock structure since the positively bowed blading reduced the static pressure of mid-span. The coupled negatively bowed blading and endwall suction also effectively enhanced the performance of cascade by removing the corner separation, with the loss coefficient reduced by as much as 41.9%. However, the suction coefficient of optimal coupled negatively bowed blading scheme reached 10.5%, which is too high for practical use. After coupled control, the 3D shock structure became “C” shaped distribution along spanwise because of the difference in influence mechanism of negatively bowed blading on different spanwise location. Due to the opposite influence effect of positively and negatively bowed blading, the shock structure in the two different schemes of cascades were different and showed opposite variation trends as aspect ratio increased.

Cite this article

CAO Zhiyuan , SONG Cheng , GAO Xi , ZHANG Xiang , LIU Bo . Computational Study on the Boundary Layer Suction Effects in the Supersonic Compressor Flow with a Bowed Blade[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022 , 31(2) : 511 -528 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1582-0

References

[1] Members of the staff of Lewis Research Center. Aerodynamic design of axial-flow compressors. NASA Report No. NASA SP-36, 1965.
[2] Wennerstrom A.J., Highly loaded axial flow compressors: history and current developments. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(4): 567–578.
[3] Dickens T., Day I., The design of highly loaded axial compressors. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3): 031007.
[4] Gbadebo S.A., Cumpsty N.A., Hynes T.P., Three-dimensional separations in axial compressors. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2005, 127(2): 331–339.
[5] Bryce J.D., Cherrett M.A., Lyes P.A., Three-dimensional flow in a highly loaded single-stage transonic fan. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 1995, 117(1): 22–28.
[6] Kerrebrock J.L., Reijnen D.P., Ziminsky W.S., et al., Aspirated compressors. ASME paper, 1997, 97-GT-525.
[7] Culley D.E., Bright M.M., Strazisar A.J., et al., Active flow separation control of a stator vane using embedded injection in a multistage compressor experiment. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(1): 24–34.
[8] Tang Y.M., Liu Y.W., Lu L.P., et al., Passive separation control with blade-end slots in a highly loaded compressor cascade. AIAA Journal, 2019, 58(1): 85–97.
[9] Kan X.X., Wu W.Y., Zhong J.J., Effects of vortex dynamics mechanism of blade-end treatment on the flow losses in a compressor cascade at critical condition. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 102(7): 105857.
[10] Kerrebrock J.L., The prospects for aspirated compressors. Proceedings of the AIAA Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit. Denver, 2000, AIAA-2000-2472.
[11] Schuler B.J., Kerrebrock J.L., Merchant A., Experiment investigation of a transonic aspirated compressor. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2005, 127(2): 340–348.
[12] Godard A., Fourmaux A., Burguburu S., et al., Design method of a subsonic aspirated cascade. ASME Turbo Expo 2006, Berlin, 2008: 2489–2500.
[13] Power B., Xu L.P., Wellborn S., Numerical and experimental findings of a highly-loaded aspirated cascade. Düsseldorf: ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, GT2014-27098, 2014.
[14] Cao Z.Y., Liu B., Zhang T, et al., Design strategies and numerical simulation of highly loaded aspirated compressor blades. Proceedings of the IMechE, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2018, 232(4): 315–336.
[15] Gbadebo S.A., Cumpsty N.A., Hynes T.P., Control of three-dimensional separations in axial compressors by tailored boundary layer suction. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(1): 011004.
[16] Cao Z.Y., Liu B., Zhang T., Control of separations in a highly loaded diffusion cascade by tailored boundary layer suction. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2014, 228(8): 1363–1374.
[17] Liu Y.W., Sun J.J., Lu L.P., Corner separation control by boundary layer suction applied to a highly loaded axial compressor cascade. Energies, 2014, 7(12): 7994–8007.
[18] Deich M.E., Gubalev A.B., Filippov G.A., et al., A new method of profiling the guide vane cascade of stage with small ratios diameter to length. Teplienergetika, 1962; 8: 42–46.
[19] Wang Z.Q., Lai S.K., Xu W.Y., Aerodynamic calculation of turbine stator cascade with curvilinear leaned blades and some experimental results. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 1981, 2(04): 328–334.
[20] Bogod A.B., Direct and inverted calculation of 2D axisymmetric and 3D flows in axial compressor blade rows. Revue Francaise de Mecanique, 1992, 4: 351–359.
[21] Wellborn S.R., Delaney R.A., Redesign of a 12-stage axial-flow compressor using multistage CFD. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2001, New Orleans, 2001, 2001-GT-0351.
[22] Cao Z.Y., Liu B., Zhang T, et al., Influence of coupled boundary layer suction and bowed blade on flow field and performance of a diffusion cascade. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(1): 249–263.
[23] Chen S.W., Zhang H.X., Meng Q.H., et al., A combined application of negative bowed blade and endwall unsteady pulsed holed suction in a highly loaded compressor cascade. ASME Turbo Expo 2018, Olso, 2018: GT2018-75912.
[24] Anthony J.S., Jerry R.W., Michael D.H., et al., Laser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial-flow fan rotor. NASA Technical Paper 2879, 1989.
[25] Lei V-M, Spakovszky Z.S., Greitzer E.M., A criterion for axial compressor hub-corner stall. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130(3): 031006.
[26] Cao Z.Y., Liu B., Zhang T., Influence of endwall boundary layer suction on the flow fields of a critically loaded diffusion cascade. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 31(1): 48.
[27] Taylor J.V., Miller R.J., Competing 3D mechanisms in compressor flows. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 139(2): 021009.
Outlines

/