Aerothermodynamics

Transonic Airfoil Drag Reduction Using Suction and Loaded Leading Edge Control

  • LI Jiahe ,
  • LIU Yanming ,
  • WANG Jiang
Expand
  • School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Online published: 2023-11-28

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

Abstract

To overcome the huge drag on an airfoil in transonic flow, a hybrid flow control method using suction and loaded leading edge (SLLE) is proposed and its active feedback control effect is studied in the different operation conditions. The loaded leading edge structure can redistribute the pressure as a passive flow control technique, while the suction slot is used to control shock wave’s position and flow separation, which can be conducted actively and automatically using feedback control system. Firstly, the investigation is conducted in steady flow, and a significant drag reduction performance is obtained. The highest drag reduction rate of 22.5% can be got when attack angle is 5°, and the increasing of lift-drag ratio can be obtained in each attack angle case. Secondly, a heuristic approach to feedback flow control is conducted in off-design inflow conditions, where a feedback-based SLLE control method is introduced. The results show the SLLE control can achieve a fair drag reduction performance which is over 10%, which indicates to a flow control method with good applicability in changing flow conditions.

Cite this article

LI Jiahe , LIU Yanming , WANG Jiang . Transonic Airfoil Drag Reduction Using Suction and Loaded Leading Edge Control[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2023 , 32(1) : 264 -277 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1687-5

References

[1] Ronald D.J., Daniel N.M., Fundamentals and applications of modern flow control. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 2009, pp. 353–372.
[2] Choi H., Moin P., Kim J., Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall bounded flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 262: 75–110. 
[3] Kline R.L., Fogleman F.F., U.S. patent application for a “Airfoil for Aircraft”. 1970, No. 20195.
[4] Fertis D.G., New airfoil design concept with improved aerodynamic characteristics. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1994, 17(3): 328–339.
[5] Pruski B.J., Bowersox R.D.W., Leading-edge flow structure of a dynamically pitching NACA 0012 airfoil. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(5): 1042–1053. 
[6] Michael P., Sait A., Michael S., Experimental study of simulated ice shapes on a NACA 0011 airfoil. 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1999. DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-96.
[7] Gray V.H., Correlations among ice measurements, impingement rates, icing conditions, and drag coefficients for unswept NACA 65A004 airfoil. NACA TN 4151, 1958.
[8] Gray V.H., von Glahn U., Effect of ice and frost formations on drag of NACA 651-212 airfoil. NACA TN 2962, 1953.
[9] Custodio D., Henoch C.W., Johari H., Aerodynamic characteristics of finite span wings with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(7): 1878–1893.
[10] Fahad R., Tariq T., Numerical investigation of the effect of leading-edge tubercles on propeller performance. Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(3): 1014–1028.
[11] Jaburi K.J., Feszty D., Passive flow control of dynamic stall via surface-based trapped vortex generators. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2018, 63(3): 1–14. 
[12] Volkan P.Y., Bedri Y., Kandil O., Particle swarm optimization of suction and blowing on airfoils at transonic speeds. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(6): 1955–1965.
[13] Lachmann G.V., Boundary layer and flow control. Pergamon Press, 1961. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-08248-5.
[14] Saric W.S., Laminar flow control with suction: theory and experiment. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 1985.
[15] Wahidi R., Bridges D., Effects of distributed suction on an airfoil at low Reynolds number. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(3): 523–539. 
[16] Liu P.Q., Duan H.S., Chen J.Z., Numerical study of suction-blowing flow control technology for an airfoil. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(1): 229–239.
[17] Smith D.W., Walker J.H., Test of an area suction flap on a NACA64A010 airfoil at high subsonic speeds. NASA TN D310, 1960. DOI: 10.2514/1.45114.
[18] Krogmann, P., Stanewsky E., Thiede P., Effects of local boundary suction on shock-boundary layer interaction and shock-induced separation. Journal of Aircraft, 1985, 22(1): 37–42.
[19] Volkan P.Y., Bedri Y., Kandil O., Particle swarm optimization of suction and blowing on airfoils at transonic speeds. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(6): 1955–1965.
[20] Jürgen S., Casey F., Thomas M., Feedback flow control: a heuristic approach. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(10): 3825–3834.
[21] Abbott I., Von D.A., Theory of wing sections. Dover Publications, New York, 1949, pp. 112–123. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9112/11/10/006.
[22] Masters D.A., Taylor N.J., Rendall T.C., Geometric comparison of aerofoil shape parameterization methods. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(5): 1575–1589. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0558.
[23] Landon R.H., NACA0012 oscillatory and transient pitching. Compendium of Unsteady Aerodynamic Measurements, AGARD-R-702, 1982.
[24] Braslow A.L., Burrows D.L., Experimental and theoretical studies of area suction for the control of the laminar flow boundary layer on a NACA 64A010 airfoil. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951. DOI: 10.1016/S1270-9638(98)80054-0.
Outlines

/