[1]
vom Lehn F., Cai L., Tripathi R., Broda R., Pitsch H., A property database of fuel compounds with emphasis on spark-ignition engine applications. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 2021, 5: 100018.
[2]
vom Lehn F., Brosius B., Broda R., Cai L., Pitsch H., Using machine learning with target-specific feature sets for structure-property relationship modeling of octane numbers and octane sensitivity. Fuel, 2020, 281: 118772.
[3]
Farrell J.T., Zigler B.T., Ratcliff M.A., et al., Co-optimization of fuels & engines: Efficiency merit function for spark-ignition engines; Revisions and Improvements Based on FY16-17 Research. US Department of Energy, 2018.
[4]
Szybist J.P., Busch S., McCormick R.L., et al., What fuel properties enable higher thermal efficiency in spark-ignited engines? Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2021, 82: 100876.
[5]
vom Lehn F., Cai L., Cáceres B.C., Pitsch H., Exploring the fuel structure dependence of laminar burning velocity: A machine learning based group contribution approach. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 232: 111525.
[6]
Bond T.C., Doherty S.J., Fahey D.W., et al., Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. Journal of geophysical research: Atmospheres, 2013, 118(11): 5380–5552.
[7]
Yield Sooting Index Database Volume 2: Sooting Tendencies of a Wide Range of Fuel Compounds on a United Scale. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7HGFT8, 2021 (accessed on 13 August 2021).
[8]
McEnally C.S., Pfefferle L.D., Sooting tendencies of oxygenated hydrocarbons in laboratory-scale flames. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(6): 2498–2503.
[9]
McEnally C.S., Pfefferle L.D., Improved sooting tendency measurements for aromatic hydrocarbons and their implications for naphthalene formation pathways. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 148(4): 210–222.
[10]
Das D.D., John P.C.S., McEnally C.S., et al., Measuring and predicting sooting tendencies of oxygenates, alkanes, alkenes, cycloalkanes, and aromatics on a unified scale. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 190: 349–364.
[11]
Pepiot-Desjardins P., Pitsch H., Malhotra R., et al., Structural group analysis for soot reduction tendency of oxygenated fuels. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 154(1–2): 191–205.
[12]
Barrientos E.J., Lapuerta M., Boehman A.L., Group additivity in soot formation for the example of C-5 oxygenated hydrocarbon fuels. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(8): 1484–1498.
[13]
St. John P.C., Kairys P., Das D.D., et al., A quantitative model for the prediction of sooting tendency from molecular structure. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(9): 9983–9990.
[14]
Gao Z., Zou X., Huang Z., et al., Predicting sooting tendencies of oxygenated hydrocarbon fuels with machine learning algorithms. Fuel, 2019, 242: 438–446.
[15]
Abdul Jameel A.G., Predicting sooting propensity of oxygenated fuels using artificial neural networks. Processes, 2021, 9(6): 1070.
[16]
Kessler T., John P.C.S., Zhu J., et al., A comparison of computational models for predicting yield sooting index. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2021, 38(1): 1385–1393.
[17]
Cai G., Liu Z., Zhang L., et al., Systematic performance evaluation of gasoline molecules based on quantitative structure-property relationship models. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 229: 116077.
[18]
Li R., Herreros J.M., Tsolakis A., et al., Machine learning-quantitative structure property relationship (ML-QSPR) method for fuel physicochemical properties prediction of multiple fuel types. Fuel, 2021, 304: 121437.
[19]
Aikawa K., Jetter J.J., Impact of gasoline composition on particulate matter emissions from a direct-injection gasoline engine: Applicability of the particulate matter index. International Journal of Engine Research, 2014, 15(3): 298–306.
[20]
Gulli A., Pal S., Deep learning with Keras. Packt Publishing Ltd, Birmingham, 2017.
[21]
Abadi M., Agarwal A., Barham P., et al., TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467, 2015.
[22]
Joback K.G., Reid R.C., Estimation of pure-component properties from group-contributions. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, 57(1–6): 233– 243.
[23]
Landrum G., RDKit: A software suite for cheminformatics, computational chemistry, and predictive modeling. 2013.
[24]
Weininger D., SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 1988, 28(1): 31–36.
[25]
Kohavi R., Sommerfield D., Feature subset selection using the wrapper method: overfitting and dynamic search space topology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1995, pp. 192–197.
[26]
Kingma D.P., Ba J., Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
[27]
Gevrey M., Dimopoulos I., Lek S., Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecological Modelling, 2003, 160(3): 249–264.
[28]
Goeb D., Davidovic M., Cai L., et al., Oxymethylene ether–n-dodecane blend spray combustion: Experimental study and large-eddy simulations. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2021, 38(2): 3417–3425.
[29]
Kerschgens B., Cai L., Pitsch H., et al., Di-n-buthylether, n-octanol, and n-octane as fuel candidates for diesel engine combustion. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 163: 66–78.
[30]
Sileghem L., Vancoillie J., Demuynck J., et al., Alternative fuels for spark-ignition engines: mixing rules for the laminar burning velocity of gasoline-alcohol blends. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(8): 4721–4727.
[31]
Kassai M., Aksu C., Shiraishi T., et al., Mechanism analysis on the effect of fuel properties on knocking performance at boosted conditions. SAE Technical Paper, 2019, 1: 35.
