Combustion and reaction

Impacts of Multi-Swirl Interaction Pattern on Self-Excited Instability Combustion Characteristics

  • JIN Ming ,
  • LIU Zhannan ,
  • LU Yudi ,
  • GE Bing ,
  • ZANG Shusheng
Expand
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Online published: 2025-03-05

Supported by

The authors would like to thank the National Science and Technology Major Project (HT-J2019-II-0018-0039) of China for financial support.

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025

Abstract

Experimental and numerical investigations have been carried out on the effects of multi-swirl interaction patterns on self-excited unstable combustion characteristics based on a five-nozzle can combustor. The multi-swirl interaction patterns include equal swirl intensity interaction and strong-weak swirl interaction. The thermo-acoustic instability characteristics indicate that increasing the central nozzle swirl intensity transforms the interaction pattern from equal swirl intensity interaction to strong-weak swirl interaction, which can significantly weaken the thermo-acoustic coupling effect under low equivalence ratio conditions, and substantially reduce the dynamic pressure amplitude during unstable combustion. The instantaneous flame structures show that the multi-swirl flames exhibit chaotic oscillations under low equivalence ratio conditions. With equivalence ratios greater than 0.71, a clear flame interaction boundary appears, and the flames can exhibit periodic oscillations in a regular structure. However, different interaction patterns result in the completely different phase oscillations in the central and outer flames. The time-averaged flame structures also indicate that strong-weak swirl interaction leads to an increase in the flame angle and a decrease in the flame length for both the central and outer flames, and the variations in the flame angle and length have great impacts on the thermo-acoustic instability mode. The fuel-staging combustion characteristics demonstrate that the instability combustion conditions with a dominant frequency of 100 Hz are greatly broadened by the strong-weak swirl interaction pattern, and the overlapping operating conditions between this mode and other modes are greatly increased. This implies that it is more flexible to adjust the thermo-acoustic unstable mode, which is conducive to the passive suppression of thermo-acoustic instability.

Cite this article

JIN Ming , LIU Zhannan , LU Yudi , GE Bing , ZANG Shusheng . Impacts of Multi-Swirl Interaction Pattern on Self-Excited Instability Combustion Characteristics[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2025 , 34(2) : 672 -688 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-025-2102-9

References

[1] Meng S., Zhang M., Gao Y., Influence of the acoustic liner in large eddy simulation of longitudinal thermoacoustic instability in a model annular combustor. Journal of Thermal Science, 2024, 33: 710–724.
[2] Smith T., Emerson B., Chterev I., et al., Flow dynamics in single and multi-nozzle swirl flames. Seoul: ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2016, Paper No: GT2016-57755, V04BT04A041. 
DOI: 10.1115/GT2016-57755
[3] Fanaca D., Alemela P., Hirsch C., et al., Comparison of the flow field of a swirl stabilized premixed burner in an annular and a single burner combustion chamber. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2010, 132(7): 071502.
[4] Li Y., Jia Y., Jin M., et al., Experimental investigations on NOx emission and combustion dynamics in an axial fuel staging combustor. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31: 198–206.
[5] Vashahi F., Lee J., On the emerging flow from a dual-axial counter-rotating swirler; LES simulation and spectral transition. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 129: 646–656.
[6] Kao Y.H., Tambe S.B., Jeng S.M., Aerodynamics study of a linearly-arranged 5-swirler array. Düsseldorf: ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2014, Paper No: GT2014-25094, V04AT04A007. 
DOI: 10.1115/GT2014-25094
[7] Kao Y., Tambe S.B., Jeng S., Aerodynamics of linearly arranged rad-rad swirlers, effect of number of swirlers and alignment. San Antonio: ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2013, Paper No: GT2013-94280, V01AT04A012. DOI: 10.1115/GT2013-94280
[8] Wang B., Zhang H., Li J., et al., Influence of adjacent nozzles on flow and fuel atomization characteristics of the central nozzle in a triple-nozzle combustor. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36: 125102.
[9] Vishwanath R.B., Tilak P.M., Chaudhuri S., An experimental study of interacting swirl flows in a model gas turbine combustor. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59: 38.
[10] Gupta S., Manoharan K., Hemchandra S., Effects of fuel staging on the hydrodynamic stability of multi-nozzle swirl flows. Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power: Transactions of the ASME, 2020, Paper No: GT2019-91152, V04BT04A012. 
DOI: 10.1115/GT2019-91152
[11] Yellugari K., Ghulam M., Shen Y.Z., Effect of nozzle spacing on flow behavior in a lean direct injection combustor. Virtual event: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, AIAA 2021-0292.
[12] Schwagerus A., Habisreuther P., Zarzalis N., Lean-blow-out simulation of natural gas fueled, premixed turbulent jet flame arrays with LES and FGM-modeling. Virtual Online: ASME Turbo Expo 2021, 2021, Paper  No: GT2021-58938, V03AT04A026. 
DOI: 10.1115/GT2021-58938
[13] Chen M.S., Zhang L.Y., Qiu P.H., et al., Experimental study of syngas combustion on a novel swirl multi-nozzle micromix combustor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 60: 1334–1344.
[14] Ramachandran G., Kumar S., Dutta A., et al., Blowoff dynamics of interacting swirl premixed flames. National Harbor, MD & Online: AIAA Scitech 2023 Forum, 2023, AIAA 2023-2179.
[15] Samarasinghe J., Peluso S.J., Quay B.D., et al., The three-dimensional structure of swirl-stabilized flames in a lean premixed multi-nozzle can combustor. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(3): 031502.
[16] Ruan C., Chen F., Yu T., et al., Experimental study on flame/flow dynamics in a multi-nozzle gas turbine model combustor under thermo-acoustically unstable condition with different swirler configurations. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 98: 105692.
[17] Liu, W.J., Ge B., Tian Y.S., Experimental investigations and large-eddy simulation of low-swirl combustion in a lean premixed multi-nozzle combustor. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56: 1–12.
[18] Tyagi A., Boxx I., Peluso S., et al., The role of flow interaction in flame-flame interaction events in a dual burner experiment. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2018, 37(2): 2485–2491.
[19] Liu Z., Xiong Y., Zhang Z., et al., Investigation of a novel combustion stabilization mechanism and combustion characteristics of a multi-nozzle array model combustor. Fuel, 2022, 327: 125138.
[20] Moon K., Yoon C., Kim K.T., Influence of rotational asymmetry on thermoacoustic instabilities in a can-annular lean-premixed combustor. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 223(4): 295–306.
[21] Kim J., John T., Adhikari S., et al., Experimental investigation of interactions between two closely spaced azimuthal modes in a multi-nozzle can combustor. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power: Transactions of the ASME, 2022, 144(10): 101021. 
[22] Kwong W.Y., Adam M.S., Effect of inter-nozzle spacing on lean blow-off of a linear multi-nozzle combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2020, 36(4): 540–550.
[23] Dolan B., Gomez R.V., Zink G., et al., Effect of nozzle spacing on Nox emissions and lean operability. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(6): 1953–1961.
[24] Dolan B., Gomez R.V., Pack S., Optical measurements of interacting lean direct injection fuel nozzles with varying spacing. Fairfield: ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2015, Paper No: GT2015-43706, V04BT04A051. DOI: 10.1115/GT2015-43706
[25] Dolan B., Gomez R.V., Nawroth H., Study on the isothermal flow fields of interacting swirl-stabilized nozzles. Kissimmee: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015, AIAA Paper 2015-0929.
[26] Szedlmayer M., Quay B.D., Samarasinghe J., Forced flame response of a lean premixed multi-nozzle can combustor. Vancouver: ASME Turbo Expo 2011, 2011, Paper No: GT2011-46080.
[27] Worth N.A., Dawson J.R., Self-excited circumferential instabilities in a model annular gas turbine combustor: Global flame dynamics. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 3127–3134.
[28] Wang X., Zeng Z., Sun X., Effect of different nozzle arrangements on combustion flow characteristics in a swirl coupling multiple direct injection combustor. Combustion Science and Technology, 2024. 
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2024.2409389
[29] Culler W., Tyagi A., Venkateswaran P., Comparison of three interacting V-flames to a single bluff body flame at two Reynolds numbers. San Diego: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016, AIAA 2016-1456.
[30] Samarasinghe J., Culler W., Quay B.D., The effect of fuel staging on the structure and instability characteristics of swirl-stabilized flames in a lean premixed multi-nozzle can combustor. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2017, 139(12): 121504.
[31] Kim D., Park J., Han D., et al., Symmetry-breaking for the control of combustion instabilities of two interacting swirl-stabilized flames. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 194(8): 180–194.
[32] Kim K.T., Lee J.G., Lee H.J., et al., Characterization of forced flame response of swirl-stabilized turbulent lean-premixed flames in a gas turbine combustor. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2010, 132(4): 041502.
[33] Lieuwen T., Mcdonell V., Santavicca D.A., et al., Burner development and operability issues associated with steady flowing syngas fired combustors. Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 180: 1167–1190.
[34] Büchner H., Hirsch C., Leuckel W., Experimental investigations on the dynamics of pulsated premixed axial jet flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 1993, 94: 219–228.
[35] Lilley D.G., Swirl flows in combustion: A review. AIAA Journal, 1977, 15(15): 1063–1078.
[36] Samiran N.A., Chong C.T., Ng J.-H., et al., Experimental and numerical studies on the premixed syngas swirl flames in a model combustor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(44): 24126–24139.
[37] Li S., Liu X., Zhang Z., et al., Numerical modeling and suppression of combustion instabilities in a partially premixed combustor. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36: 095155.
[38] Shen S., Song X., Zong C., et al., Effect of the structure parameters of a low swirler on premixed characteristics. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31: 207–213.
[39] Liu W., Xue R., Zhang L., et al., Dynamic response of a forced low-swirl premixed flame with acoustic excitation. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2022, 108(4): 1139–1157.
[40] Li Y., Hu C., Zhao Q., et al., Experimental investigation of flame dynamics based on high-speed images in swirl combustion systems. Journal of Thermal Science, 2023, 32: 427–437.
[41] Jung J., Kim D., Wang Y., et al., Suppression of combustion oscillations in hydrogen-enriched can-type combustors through fuel staging. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2025, 147(1): 011010.
[42] Kwak S., Choi J., Lee M.C., et al., Attenuation of combustion instability in a fuel-staged dual-nozzle gas turbine combustor with asymmetric hydrogen composition. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2023, 39(4): 4681–4690.
[43] Jin U., Kim K.T., Hybrid rich- and lean-premixed ammonia-hydrogen combustion for mitigation of NOx emissions and thermoacoustic instabilities. Combustion and Flame, 2024, 262: 113366.
[44] Stopper U., Meier W., Sadanadan R., et al., Experimental study of industrial gas turbine flames including quantification of pressure influence on flow field, fuel/air premixing and flame shape. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(10): 2103–2118.
Outlines

/