Experimental Study for Effect of Multi-Site Spark Ignition on Dedicated Hybrid Engine Performance under High Dilution Condition

  • YAN Bowen ,
  • WATERS Benjamin ,
  • HAINES Andrew ,
  • MCGHEE Mike ,
  • HU Tiegang ,
  • DENG Wei ,
  • PU Yongxian ,
  • MA Tianyu
Expand
  • 1. Powertrain Engineering R&D Center, Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400000, China
    2. Changan UK R&D Centre Limited, Birmingham B377YG, United Kingdom

Online published: 2025-01-09

Supported by

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Chongqing Technical Innovation and Application Development Project (cstc2020jscx-dxwtBX0024) and China Internal Combustion Engine Society Youth Talent Promotion Program.

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

Abstract

In this study, a triple spark ignition scheme was first designed on a three-cylinder 1.5-L dedicated hybrid engine (DHE). On this basis, the effect of different ignition modes on engine combustion and emission characteristics was studied, especially under high dilution condition. The results tested at 2000 r/min and 0.8 MPa BMEP (brake mean effective pressure) show that with highly increased in-cylinder flow intensity, using only passive prechamber (PPC) has a lower lean limit than that with single central spark plug (CSP), thereby leading to slightly higher minimum fuel consumption and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. Adding side spark plugs (SSP) based on PPC can result in improved capability of lean limit extension and engine performance than CSP. However, the improvement level is lower than that with triple spark plugs (TSP). As the excess air ratio λ increases, the advantage of PPC and PPC with SSP in improving the combustion phasing compared with CSP gradually weakens. Correspondingly, the increasing tendency of their ignition delay and combustion duration is more obvious. The added SSP based on PPC can effectively shorten the ignition delay of leaner mixture, but the combustion duration can be only slightly improved. As a result, under extremely lean condition, the advantage of PPC and PPC with SSP in terms of combustion characteristics over CSP becomes much smaller. In contrast, the TSP ignition can achieve much shorter ignition delay and combustion duration simultaneously under this condition. Due to the highest available dilution level, the TSP ignition achieves the lowest raw NOx emissions. Moreover, it can also reduce the raw carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC) emissions compared to CSP due to a more thorough combustion of the end gas mixture. Based on the excellent performance of TSP, the highest engine brake thermal efficiency (BTE) was further explored. The results show that with normal RON 92 fuel, the engine finally achieved 43.69% and 45.02% BTE under stochiometric mode with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and lean-burn mode respectively. When using RON 100 fuel, the highest BTE was further increased to 45.63% under lean-burn mode.

Cite this article

YAN Bowen , WATERS Benjamin , HAINES Andrew , MCGHEE Mike , HU Tiegang , DENG Wei , PU Yongxian , MA Tianyu . Experimental Study for Effect of Multi-Site Spark Ignition on Dedicated Hybrid Engine Performance under High Dilution Condition[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2025 , 34(1) : 254 -267 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-024-2012-2

References

[1] Tate E., Harpster M.O., Savagian P., The electrification of the automobile: From conventional hybrid, to plug-in hybrids, to extended-range electric vehicles. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars Electronic & Electrical Systems, 2009, 1(1): 156–166.
[2] Nakata K., Shimizu R., Toyota’s new combustion technology for high engine thermal efficiency and high engine output performance. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 12. Verkehrstechnik-Fahrzeugtechnik, 2016, Pt.2 TN.799, pp: 1–17.
[3] Hakariya M., Toda T., Sakai M., The new Toyota inline 4-cylinder 2.5 L gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1021, 2017.
[4] Yamaji K., Tomimatsu M., Takagi I., Higuchi A., New 2.0L I4 gasoline direct injection engine with Toyota new global architecture concept. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0370, 2018.
[5] Lee B., Oh H., Han S., Woo S., Son J., Development of high efficiency gasoline engine with thermal efficiency over 42%. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2229, 2017.
[6] Zhang G., Wang Q., Chen G., et al., Geely hybrid engine: world class efficiency for hybrid vehicles. 29th Aachen Colloquium Sustainable Mobility, 2020, pp: 65–95.
[7] Jung D., Lee B., Son J., et al., Development of GDI engine for improving brake thermal efficiency over 44%. ASME 2019 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 2019.
[8] Yamaguchi R., Egawa T., Ushio N., Kasajima Y., et al., New 2.0 L inline 4-cylinder gasoline direct injection engine. SAE Technical Paper 2023-01-0400, 2023.
[9] Yan B., Yao M., Mao B., et al., A comparative study on the fuel economy improvement of a natural gas SI engine at the lean-burn the and stoichiometric operation both with EGR under the premise of meeting EU6 emission legislation. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1958, 2015.
[10] Adomeit P., Scharf J., Thewes M., et al., Extreme lean gasoline technology - best efficiency and lowest emission powertrains. Internationaler Motorenkongress, 2017, 2017: 101–122.
[11] Sellers R., Osborne R., Cai W., Wang Y., Designing and testing the next generation of high-efficiency gasoline engine achieving 45% brake thermal efficiency. 28th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2019, pp: 1129–1143.
[12] Brannys S., Gehrke I.S., Hoffmeyer H., et al., Maximum efficiency concept of a 1.5 L TSI evo for future hybrid powertrains. 28th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2019, pp: 99–120.
[13] Bunce M., Blaxill H., Cooper A., Development of both active and passive prechamber jet ignition multi-cylinder demonstrator engines. 28th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2019, pp: 907–941.
[14] Attard W.P., Blaxill H., A lean-burn gasoline fueled prechamber jet ignition combustion system achieving high efficiency and low NOx at part load. SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1146, 2012.
[15] Attard W. P., Blaxill H., A gasoline fueled prechamber jet ignition combustion system at unthrottled conditions. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2012, 5(2): 315–329.
[16] Anderson, E.K., Attard W.P., Brown A., et al., Experimental study of a prechamber jet igniter in a turbocharged Rotax 914 aircraft engine. SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1629, 2013.
[17] Sens M., Binder E., Prechamber ignition as a key technology for future powertrain fleets. MTZ Worldwide, 2019, 80: 44–51.
[18] Alvarez C.E.C., Couto G.E., Roso V.R., et al., A review of prechamber ignition systems as lean combustion technology for SI engines. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 107–120.
[19] Forte C., Bianchi G.M., Corti E., et al., Evaluation of the effects of a twin spark ignition system on combustion stability of a high performance PFI engine. Energy Procedia, 2015, 81: 897–906.
[20] Bailkeri N., Prasad K., Rao S., Performance study on twin plug spark ignition engine at different ignition timings. International Journal of Science & Research, 2013, 2(8): 231–236.
[21] Dubey A., Pareta A., Sharma P., Study of multiple spark ignition engines with single spark ignition engines on the basis of engine efficiency and emission characteristics size. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 2014, 3: 14–17.
[22] Matsuura K., Measurements of flame propagation in a rotary engine using rotor-installed ionization gaps. Transactions of the JSME, 2019, 85(869): 18–00312.
[23] Sellnau M., Cho K., Zhang Y., Pathway to 50% brake thermal efficiency using gasoline direct injection compression ignition (GDCI). 28th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2019, pp: 1145–1171.
[24] Yang B., Wang H., Yao M., et al., Experimental investigation on the effects of injection strategy on combustion and emission in a heavy-duty diesel engine fueled with gasoline. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2266, 2017.
[25] Nakai E., Goto T., Ezumi K., et al., Mazda SKYACTIV-X 2.0 L gasoline engine. 28th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2019, pp: 55–78.
[26] Li J., Zhao H., Ladommatos N., et al., Research and development of controlled auto-ignition (CAI) combustion in a 4-stroke multi-cylinder gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3608, 2001.
[27] Xie H., Yang L., Qin J., et al., The effect of spark ignition on the CAI combustion operation. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3738, 2005.
[28] Wang Z., Wang J., Shuai S., et al., Research on spark induced compression ignition (SICI). SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0132, 2009.
[29] Nagasawa T., Okura Y., Yamada R., et al., Thermal efficiency improvement of super-lean-burn spark ignition engine by stratified water insulation on piston top surface. International Journal of Engine Research, 2021, 22(5): 1421–1439.
[30] Nakata K., Nogawa S., Takahashi D., Engine Technologies for achieving 45% thermal efficiency of S.I. engine. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1896, 2015.
[31] Roethlisberger R.P., Favrat D., Comparison between direct and indirect (prechamber) spark ignition in the case of a cogeneration natural gas engine, part I: engine geometrical parameters. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002, 22(11): 1217–1229.
[32] Roethlisberger R.P., Favrat D., Comparison between direct and indirect (prechamber) spark ignition in the case of a cogeneration natural gas engine: Part II: engine operating parameters and turbocharger characteristics. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002, 22(11): 1231–1243.
[33] Baumgartner L.S., Karmann S., Backes F., et al., Experimental investigation of orifice design effects on a methane fueled prechamber gas engine for automotive applications. SAE Technical Paper 2017-24-0096, 2017.
[34] Tohru N., Yoshihiro N., Effect of dimensions of prechamber on lean-burn gas engine. JSME International Journal Series B Fluids and Thermal Engineering, 1994, 37(4): 951–956.
[35] Yan B., Wang H., Zheng Z., et al., The effects of LIVC miller cycle on the combustion characteristics and thermal efficiency in a stoichiometric operation natural gas engine with EGR. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 122: 439–450.
[36] Heywood J.B., Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988, pp: 574–576.
[37] Theis J.R., Kim J., Cavataio G., TWC+LNT/SCR systems for satisfying Tier 2, Bin 2 emission standards on lean-burn gasoline engines. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 2015, 8(2): 474–486.
[38] Prikhodko V.Y., Parks J.E., Pihl J.A., Toops T.J., Ammonia generation over TWC for passive SCR NOx control for lean gasoline engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2014, 7(3): 1235–1243.
[39] Prikhodko V.Y., Parks J.E., Pihl J.A., Toops T.J., Ammonia generation and utilization in a passive SCR (TWC+SCR) system on lean gasoline engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, 9(2): 1289–1295.

Outlines

/