CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Systems for Combined Heat and Power Production: an Evaluation of Various Plant Configurations

展开
  • Chair of Energy Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85747 Garching, Germany

网络出版日期: 2023-12-01

版权

The Author(s) 2022

CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Systems for Combined Heat and Power Production: an Evaluation of Various Plant Configurations

Expand
  • Chair of Energy Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85747 Garching, Germany

Online published: 2023-12-01

Copyright

The Author(s) 2022

本文引用格式

SCHIFFLECHNER Christopher, WIELAND Christoph, SPLIETHOFF Hartmut . CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Systems for Combined Heat and Power Production: an Evaluation of Various Plant Configurations[J]. 热科学学报, 2022 , 31(5) : 1266 -1278 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1694-6

Abstract

CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems are a promising concept for utilising petrothermal resources in the context of a future carbon capture utilisation and sequestration economy. Petrothermal geothermal energy has a tremendous worldwide potential for decarbonising both the power and heating sectors. This paper investigates three potential CPG configurations for combined heating and power generation (CHP). The present work examines scenarios with reservoir depths of 4 km and 5 km, as well as required district heating system (DHS) supply temperatures of 70°C and 90°C. The results reveal that a two-staged serial CHP concept eventuates in the highest achievable net power output. For a thermosiphon system, the relative net power reduction by the CHP option compared with a sole power generation system is significantly lower than for a pumped system. The net power reduction for pumped systems lies between 62.6% and 22.9%. For a thermosiphon system with a depth of 5 km and a required DHS supply temperature of 70°C, the achievable net power by the most beneficial CHP option is even 9.2% higher than for sole power generation systems. The second law efficiency for the sole power generation concepts are in a range between 33.0% and 43.0%. The second law efficiency can increase up to 63.0% in the case of a CHP application. Thus, the combined heat and power generation can significantly increase the overall second law efficiency of a CPG system. The evaluation of the achievable revenues demonstrates that a CHP application might improve the economic performance of both thermosiphon and pumped CPG systems. However, the minimum heat revenue required for compensating the power reduction increases with higher electricity revenues. In summary, the results of this work provide valuable insights for the potential development of CPG systems for CHP applications and their economic feasibility.

参考文献

[1] Lee I., Tester J.W., You F., Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 109: 551–577.
[2] Aghahosseini A., Breyer C., From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential. Applied Energy, 2020, 279: 115769.
[3] Eyerer S., Schifflechner C., Hofbauer S., Bauer W., Wieland C., Spliethoff H., Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 120: 109661.
[4] Pan S.-Y., Gao M., Shah K.J., Zheng J., Pei S.-L., Chiang P.-C., Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132: 19–32.
[5] Breede K., Dzebisashvili K., Liu X., Falcone G., A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy, 2013. DOI: 10.1186/2195-9706-1-4.
[6] Benim A.C., Cicek A., Eker A.M., A computational investigation of the thermohydraulics of an EGS Project. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(5): 405–412.
[7] Gao K., Liu W., Ma T., Hu Y., Fang T., Ye L., Numerical simulation study of a novel horizontally layered enhanced geothermal system: A case study of the Qiabuqia geothermal area, Qinghai Province, China. Journal of Thermal Science, 2021, 30(4): 1328–1340.
[8] Zhu J., Hu K., Zhang W., Lu X., A study on generating a map for selection of optimum power generation cycles used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems. Energy, 2017, 133: 502–512.
[9] Adams B., Fleming M.R., Bielicki J.M., Garapati N., Saar M.O., An analysis of the demonstration of a CO2-based thermosiphon at the SECARB Cranfield Site.  46th Annual Stanford Geothermal Workshop (SGW 2021), Online, February 16–18, 2021. 
DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000467171. 
[10] Brown D.W., A hot dry rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO2 instead of water. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, 2000, pp. 233–238. 
[11] Randolph J.B., Saar M.O., Combining geothermal energy capture with geologic carbon dioxide sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011. 
DOI: 10.1029/2011GL047265.
[12] Adams B.M., Kuehn T.H., Bielicki J.M., Randolph J.B., Saar M.O., A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions. Applied Energy, 2015, 140: 365–377.
[13] Garapati N., Adams B.M., Fleming M.R., Kuehn T.H., Saar M.O., Combining brine or CO2 geothermal preheating with low-temperature waste heat: A higher-efficiency hybrid geothermal power system. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2020, 42: 101323.
[14] Miranda-Barbosa E., Sigfússon B., Carlsson J., Tzimas E., Advantages from combining CCS with geothermal energy. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6666–6676.
[15] Gupta N., Vashistha M., Carbon dioxide Plume Geothermal (CPG) System-A new approach for enhancing geothermal energy production and deployment of CCUS on large scale in India. Energy Procedia, 2016, 90: 492–502.
[16] Hansper J., Grotkamp S., Langer M., Wechsung M., Adams B.M., Saar M.O., Assessment of performance and costs of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Systems. European Geothermal Congress, 2019.
[17] Goetzl G., Milenic D., Schifflechner C., Geothermal-DHC, European research network on geothermal energy in heating and cooling networks. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2020+1. 
[18] Eyerer S., Dawo F., Schifflechner C., Niederdränk A., Spliethoff H., Wieland C., Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications. Applied Energy, 2022, 315: 119057.
[19] Chávez O., Godínez F., Polygeneration study of low-to-medium enthalpy geothermal reservoirs in Mexico. Journal of Thermal Science, 2021, 30: 1077–1087.
[20] Schifflechner C., Kaufmann F., Irrgang L., Kuhnert L., Dawo F., Wieland C., et al., Evaluation of plant configurations for geothermal trigeneration systems with organic Rankine Cycles. In: Technical University of Munich, editor. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, 2021. 
DOI: 10.14459/2021mp1632994.
[21] Gladysz P., Pajak L., Sowizdzal A., Miecznik M., CO2 enhanced geothermal system for heat and electricity production – process configuration analysis for central Poland. Proceedings of ECOS, 2019.
[22] Gladysz P., Sowiżdżał A., Miecznik M., Pająk L., Carbon dioxide-enhanced geothermal systems for heat and electricity production: Energy and economic analyses for central Poland. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 220: 113142.
[23] Schifflechner C., Dawo F., Eyerer S., Wieland C., Spliethoff H., Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation. Renewable Energy, 2020, 161: 1292–1302.
[24] Fleming M.R., Adams B.M., Kuehn T.H., Bielicki J.M., Saar M.O., Increased power generation due to exothermic water exsolution in CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) power plants. Geothermics, 2020, 88: 101865.
[25] Adams B.M., Kuehn T.H., Bielicki J.M., Randolph J.B., Saar M.O., On the importance of the thermosiphon effect in CPG (CO2 plume geothermal) power systems. Energy, 2014, 69: 409–418.
[26] Sudhoff R., Glos S., Wechsung M., Adams B., Saar M.O., Next Level Geothermal Power Generation (NGP) – A new sCO2-based geothermal concept. Proceedings of the German Geothermal Congress 2019.
DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000449693.
[27] MATLAB. Version R2019b. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc., 2019.
[28] Lemmon E., Bell I., Huber M., McLinden M., NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 10.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018.
[29] Atrens A.D., Gurgenci H., Rudolph V., Electricity generation using a carbon-dioxide thermosiphon. Geothermics, 2010, 39(2): 161–169.
[30] Schifflechner C., Dawo F., Eyerer S., Wieland C., Spliethoff H., Combined heat and power generation by enhanced geothermal systems: Comparison of direct and indirect concepts for water and supercritical CO2 as heat carriers. 5th International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, Athens, Greece, 2019. 
[31] Gabbrielli R., A novel design approach for small scale low enthalpy binary geothermal power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 64: 263–272.
[32] Dawo F., Wieland C., Spliethoff H., Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data. Energy, 2019, 174: 625–637.
[33] Lund H., Werner S., Wiltshire R., Svendsen S., Thorsen J.E., Hvelplund F., et al., 4th Generation District Heating (4GDH): Integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems. Energy, 2014, 68: 1–11.
[34] Heberle F., Brüggemann D., Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle for combined heat and power generation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(11–12): 1326–1332.
[35] Schifflechner C., Wieland C., Spliethoff H., Thermodynamic and economic optimization of CO2 Plume Geothermal Systems for combined heat and power production. The 34th International Conference On Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems. Taormina, Italy, 2021. DOI: 10.52202/062738-0066.
文章导航

/