其他

Energy, Exergy, and Exergoeconomic Analysis of Solar-Driven Solid Oxide Electrolyzer System Integrated with Waste Heat Recovery for Syngas Production

  • WANG Jiangjiang ,
  • YAO Wenqi ,
  • CUI Zhiheng ,
  • GAO Yuefen
展开
  • Hebei Key Laboratory of Low Carbon and High-Efficiency Power Generation Technology, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China

网络出版日期: 2023-11-28

基金资助

This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52276007) and the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52090064).

版权

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

Energy, Exergy, and Exergoeconomic Analysis of Solar-Driven Solid Oxide Electrolyzer System Integrated with Waste Heat Recovery for Syngas Production

  • WANG Jiangjiang ,
  • YAO Wenqi ,
  • CUI Zhiheng ,
  • GAO Yuefen
Expand
  • Hebei Key Laboratory of Low Carbon and High-Efficiency Power Generation Technology, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China

Online published: 2023-11-28

Supported by

This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52276007) and the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52090064).

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

摘要

太阳能与燃料电池技术相结合产生的合成气燃料是未来绿色能源解决碳中和问题的一种很有前景的方法。本文设计了一种新型太阳能驱动固体氧化物电解槽系统,该系统集成了余热系统以制备合成气。太阳能光伏和抛物线槽集热器共同驱动固体氧化物电解槽,以提高系统效率。建立了各部件的热力学模型,并进行了能量、(火用)和(火用经济)分析,以评估系统的性能。在设计工况下,太阳能光伏发电由于其转换效率较低,占总(火用)损失的88.46%。经济性分析表明,燃料电池组件的经济性系数较高,为89.56%,这是因为其投资成本较大。讨论了电流密度、工作温度、压力和摩尔分数等关键参数对系统性能的影响。结果表明,当SOEC的温度、压力和水蒸气摩尔分数分别为1223.K、0.MPa和50%时,最佳能量效率和(火用)效率分别为19.04%和19.90%。

本文引用格式

WANG Jiangjiang , YAO Wenqi , CUI Zhiheng , GAO Yuefen . Energy, Exergy, and Exergoeconomic Analysis of Solar-Driven Solid Oxide Electrolyzer System Integrated with Waste Heat Recovery for Syngas Production[J]. 热科学学报, 2023 , 32(1) : 135 -152 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1723-5

Abstract

Syngas fuel generated by solar energy integrating with fuel cell technology is one of the promising methods for future green energy solutions to carbon neutrality. This paper designs a novel solar-driven solid oxide electrolyzer system integrated with waste heat for syngas production. Solar photovoltaic and parabolic trough collecter together drive the solid oxide electrolysis cell to improve system efficiency. The thermodynamic models of components are established, and the energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis are conducted to evaluate the system’s performance. Under the design work conditions, the solar photovoltaic accounts for 88.46% of total exergy destruction caused by its less conversion efficiency. The exergoeconomic analysis indicates that the fuel cell component has a high exergoeconomic factor of 89.56% due to the large capital investment cost. The impacts of key parameters such as current density, operating temperature, pressure and mole fraction on system performances are discussed. The results demonstrate that the optimal energy and exergy efficiencies are achieved at 19.04% and 19.90% when the temperature, pressure, and molar fraction of H2O are 1223.15 K, 0.1 MPa, and 50%, respectively.

参考文献

[1] Wang J., Qi X., Ren F., Zhang G., Wang J., Optimal design of hybrid combined cooling, heating and power systems considering the uncertainties of load demands and renewable energy sources. Journal of Clean Production, 2021, 281: 125357.
[2] Gao Y., Yao W., Wang J., Cui Z., Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with solar-assisted electrolytic cell. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022. 
DOI: 10.1007/s11630-022-1680-z.
[3] Singh G.K., Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review. Energy, 2013, 53: 1–13.
[4] Al-Sulaiman F.A., Hamdullahpur F., Dincer I., Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renewable Energy, 2012, 48: 161–172.
[5] Calise F., Dentice d'Accadia M., Piacentino A., A novel solar trigeneration system integrating PVT (photovoltaic/thermal collectors) and SW (seawater) desalination: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment. Energy, 2014, 67: 129–148.
[6] Wang J., Han Z., Liu Y., Zhang X., Cui Z., Thermodynamic analysis of a combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with full-spectrum hybrid solar energy device. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 228: 113596.
[7] Cinti G., Discepoli G., Bidini G., Lanzini A., Santarelli M., Co-electrolysis of water and CO2 in a solid oxide electrolyzer (SOE) stack. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40: 207–215.
[8] Gahleitner G., Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 2039–2061.
[9] Sánchez M., Amores E., Abad D., Rodríguez L., Clemente-Jul C., Aspen Plus model of an alkaline electrolysis system for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 3916–3929.
[10] Schefold J., Brisse A., Poepke H., Long-term Steam electrolysis with electrolyte-supported solid oxide cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 179: 161–168.
[11] Kazempoor P., Braun R.J., Model validation and performance analysis of regenerative solid oxide cells: Electrolytic operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 2669–2684.
[12] Graves C., Ebbesen S.D., Mogensen M., Co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid oxide cells: Performance and durability. Solid State Ionics, 2011, 192: 398–403.
[13] Wang B., Li W., Ma C., Yang W., Pudasainee D., Gupta R., Synergistic effect on the co-gasification of petroleum coke and carbon-based feedstocks: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2022, 102: 1–13.
[14] Li W., Wang H., Shi Y., Cai N., Performance and methane production characteristics of H2O-CO2 co-electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 11104–11109.
[15] Kazempoor P., Braun R.J., Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production using high temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 3599–3612.
[16] Li Y., Wang J., Zhao D., Li G., Chen C., A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: Combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making. Energy, 2018, 162: 237–254.
[17] Shekari Namin A., Rostamzadeh H., Nourani P., Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of three cascade power plants coupled with RO desalination unit, driven by a salinity-gradient solar pond. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2020, 18: 100562.
[18] Cao Y., Habibi H., Zoghi M., Raise A., Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and parametric study. Energy, 2021, 236: 121432.
[19] Ebbesen S.D., Graves C., Mogensen M., Production of synthetic fuels by co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide. International Journal of Green Energy, 2009, 6: 646–660.
[20] Akikur R.K., Saidur R., Ping H.W., Ullah K.R., Performance analysis of a co-generation system using solar energy and SOFC technology. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 79: 415–430.
[21] Wang F., Wang L., Ou Y., Lei X., Yuan J., Liu X., Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide electrolyzer integration with engine waste heat recovery for hydrogen production. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 27: 101240.
[22] Hernández-Pacheco E., Singh D., Hutton P.N., Patel N., Mann M.D., A macro-level model for determining the performance characteristics of solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 138: 174–186.
[23] Huang Z., Li Z., Tao W., Thermodynamic analysis of solar hydrogen production with high temperature steam electrolysis. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30: 9–11.
[24] Wang J., Han Z., Guan Z., Hybrid solar-assisted combined cooling, heating, and power systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 133: 110256.
[25] Yan R., Wang J., Cheng Y., Ma C., Yu T., Thermodynamic analysis of fuel cell combined cooling heating and power system integrated with solar reforming of natural gas. Solar Energy, 2020, 206: 396–412.
[26] Wang H., Yu Z., Wang D., Li G., Xu G., Energy, exergetic and economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of atmospheric and pressurized SOFC based trigeneration systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 239: 114183.
[27] Habibi H., Zoghi M., Chitsaz A., Shamsaiee M., Thermo-economic performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a screw expander-based cascade Rankine cycle integrated with parabolic trough solar collector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 180: 115827.
[28] Habibollahzade A., Gholamian E., Behzadi A., Multi-objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents. Applied Energy, 2019, 233–234: 985–1002.
[29] Chitgar N., Emadi M.A., Development and exergoeconomic evaluation of a SOFC-GT driven multi-generation system to supply residential demands: Electricity, fresh water and hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 17932–17954.
[30] Malik M.Z., Musharavati F., Khanmohammadi S., Pakseresht A.H., Khanmohammadi S., Nguyen D.D., Design and comparative exergy and exergo-economic analyses of a novel integrated Kalina cycle improved with fuel cell and thermoelectric module. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 220: 113081.
[31] Lee Y.D., Ahn K.Y., Morosuk T., Tsatsaronis G., Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined heat and power generation system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 85: 154–164.
[32] Su B.S., Han W., Chen Y., Wang Z.F., Qu W.J., Jin H.G., Performance optimization of a solar assisted CCHP based on biogas reforming. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 604–617.
[33] Wang J., Chen Y., Lior N., Exergo-economic analysis method and optimization of a novel photovoltaic/thermal solar-assisted hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 199: 111945.
[34] Mignard D., Correlating the chemical engineering plant cost index with macro-economic indicators. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2014, 92: 285–294.
[35] Borowy Z.M.S.B.S., Photovoltaic module-site matching based on the capacity factors. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 1995. DOI: 10.1109/60.391899.
[36] Momma A., Kato T., Kaga Y., Nagata S., Polarization behavior of high temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC). Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 1997, 105: 369–373.
[37] Ni M., Leung M., Leung D., Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by solid oxide steam electrolyzer plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32: 4648–4660.
[38] Wu Z., Zhu P., Yao J., Zhang S., Ren J., Yang F., Combined biomass gasification, SOFC, IC engine, and waste heat recovery system for power and heat generation: Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluations. Applied Energy, 2020, 279: 115794.

文章导航

/