Impact of Startup Strategy and Buffer Tank Volume on the Compressor Inlet State for a 3-MW sCO2 Brayton Cycle

  • ZHAO Decai ,
  • WANG Bo
展开
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (IET), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100190, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

网络出版日期: 2025-01-09

基金资助

This work is supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2017-I-0002-0002) and Major National Science And Technology Infrastructure “High-Efficiency and Low-Carbon Gas Turbine Research Facility” (Grant No. 2017-000052-73-01-001569).

版权

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

Impact of Startup Strategy and Buffer Tank Volume on the Compressor Inlet State for a 3-MW sCO2 Brayton Cycle

  • ZHAO Decai ,
  • WANG Bo
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy and Power, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (IET), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100190, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Online published: 2025-01-09

Supported by

This work is supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2017-I-0002-0002) and Major National Science And Technology Infrastructure “High-Efficiency and Low-Carbon Gas Turbine Research Facility” (Grant No. 2017-000052-73-01-001569).

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

摘要

超临界二氧化碳(sCO2)布雷顿循环系统因其高效率、结构紧凑和良好的热源适应性等优势,已逐渐成为一种新兴的、极具潜力的热功转换方式。基于国家重大基础设施项目“高效低碳燃气轮机试验装置”下属的循环输出功率接近3MW的sCO2布雷顿循环试验台,建立了简单回热循环系统的较为详细的动态仿真模型,研究了系统在启动过程中采用不同启动策略和不同缓冲罐容积时的动态响应特性。研究结果表明,缓冲罐容积越小,启动过程中压缩机入口参数波动越快、振幅越明显。如压缩机入口密度的允许相对偏差限制不超过5%,那么缓冲罐容积与整个闭式循环容积占比不应低于36.8%;透平旁路启动时,采用同时升温、升转速的策略可以有效减小压缩机入口参数的波动、帮助更快地达到稳定;为减少旁路切换时参数的波动,给出了旁路切换时透平旁路阀(TBV)和透平主调节阀(MGV)开度的匹配表。研究结果可为试验台后续的调试和运行提供一定参考。

本文引用格式

ZHAO Decai , WANG Bo . Impact of Startup Strategy and Buffer Tank Volume on the Compressor Inlet State for a 3-MW sCO2 Brayton Cycle[J]. 热科学学报, 2025 , 34(1) : 159 -175 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-024-1994-0

Abstract

The supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton cycle system has become an emerging and highly promising method of thermal power conversion due to its efficiency advantage, system compactness, and excellent adaptability of the heat sources. For the low carbon sCO2 Brayton cycle testbed with cycle output power approaching 3 MW, a relatively detailed dynamic simulation model of the entire system is constructed to explore the dynamic response characteristics of the system with different startup strategies and different buffer tank volumes during the startup process. The simulation results indicate that the smaller the volume of the buffer tank, the more rapid and obvious the parameter fluctuation in the buffer tank during the startup. Assuming the allowable relative deviation limit of density is 5%, then the ratio of the buffer tank volume to the volume of the entire closed loop should not be lower than 36.80%. The strategy of simultaneous temperature and speed increase during turbine bypass start can effectively reduce the fluctuation of compressor inlet parameters and reach the steady-state more quickly. This paper provides the recommended matching table for the opening of the turbine bypass valve (TBV) and the main regulating valve (MGV) to reduce the parameter fluctuation during the bypass switching. The effectiveness of the proposed turbine bypass and bypass switching startup strategy is verified by simulation, which may be used as a reference for test bench’s future debugging and operation.

参考文献

[1] Ahn Y., Bae S., Kim M., et al., Review of supercritical CO2 power cycle technology and current status of research and development. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2015, 47(6): 647–661.
[2] Li M., Zhu H., Guo J., et al., The development technology and applications of supercritical CO2 power cycle in nuclear energy, solar energy and other energy industries. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 126: 255–275.
[3] White M., Bianchi G., Chai L., et al., Review of supercritical CO2 technologies and systems for power generation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 185: 116447.
[4] Liao G., Liu L., E J., et al., Effects of technical progress on performance and application of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 199: 111986.
[5] Dostál V., A super critical carbon dioxide cycle for next generation nuclear reactors. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
[6] Cabeza L., Gracia A., Fernández A., et al., Supercritical CO2 as heat transfer fluid: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125: 799–810.
[7] Guo J., Li M., He Y., et al., A systematic review of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) power cycle for energy industries: Technologies, key issues, and potential prospects. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 258: 115437.
[8] Li H., Zhang Y., Bai W., et al., Control strategies and dynamic experimental tests on the wide-range and rapid load regulation of a first pilot multi-megawatts fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 279: 116748.
[9] Wang R., Li X., Qin Z., et al., Dynamic response and emergency measures under failure conditions of sCO2 Brayton cycle. Energy Science & Engineering, 2022, 10(12): 4726–4746.
[10] Ma Y., Morozyuk T., Liu M., et al., Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach. Applied Energy, 2019, 242: 1134–1154.
[11] Mohammadi Z., Fallah M., Mahmoudi S., Advanced exergy analysis of recompression supercritical CO2 cycle. Energy, 2019, 178: 631–643.
[12] Xu C., Li X., Xin T., et al., A thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of a modified de-carbonization coal-fired power plant incorporating a supercritical CO2 power cycle and an absorption heat transformer. Energy, 2019, 179: 30–45.
[13] Clementoni E., Cox T., Sprague C., Startup and operation of a supercritical carbon dioxide brayton cycle. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2014, 136(7): 071701.
[14] Cho J., Shin H., Cho J., et al., Development of the supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle experimental loop with a turbo-generator. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2017.
[15] Jiang Y., Zhan L., Tian X., et al., Thermodynamic performance comparison and optimization of sCO2 Brayton cycle, tCO2 Brayton cycle and tCO2 Rankine cycle. Journal of Thermal Science, 2023, 32(2): 611– 627.
[16] Carstens N., Control strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide power conversion systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
[17] Olumayegun O., Wang M., Dynamic modelling and control of supercritical CO2 power cycle using waste heat from industrial processes. Fuel, 2019, 249: 89–102.
[18] Bian X., Wang X., Wang R., et al., A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different control valves on the dynamic performance of a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Energy, 2022, 248: 123630.
[19] Deng T., Li X., Wang Q., et al., Dynamic modelling and transient characteristics of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle. Energy, 2019, 180: 292–302.
[20] Liese E., Albright J., Zitney S., Startup, shutdown, and load-following simulations of a 10 MWe supercritical CO2 recompression closed Brayton cycle. Applied Energy, 2020, 277: 115628.
[21] Li X., Liu H., Lin Z., Study on the dynamic characteristics of a supercritical CO2 power system during emergency shutdown. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2021, 41(5): 420–425. (in Chinese)
[22] Bian X., Wang X., Wang R., et al., Optimal selection of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on part-load performance. Energy, 2022, 256: 124691.
[23] Hexemer M., Supercritical CO2 brayton recompression cycle design and control features to support startup and operation. The 4th International Symposium— Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles: Technologies for Transformational Energy Conversion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, September 9–10, 2014.
[24] Wang R., Li X., Qin Z., et al., Control strategy for actual constraints during the start-stop process of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 226: 120289.
[25] Conboy T., Pasch J., Fleming D., Control of a supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle demonstration loop. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2013, 135(11): 111701.
[26] Luu M., Milani D., McNaughton R., et al., Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems. Energy, 2017, 124: 752–771.
[27] Dyreby J., Modeling the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with recompression. The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2014.
[28] Duniam S., Veeraragavan A., Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power. Energy, 2019, 187: 115992.
[29] Yang J., Yang Z., Duan Y., Part-load performance analysis and comparison of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 214: 112832.
[30] Zhang J., Yang Z., Le M., Dynamic modeling and transient analysis of a molten salt heated recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. The 6th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, March 27–29, 2018.
[31] Kundu P., Cohen I., David R., Fluid mechanics (Fifth Edition). Elsevier, 2012.
[32] Ma Y., Morosuk T., Liu M., et al., Investigation of off-design characteristics of an improved recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for concentrated solar power application. International Journal of Energy Research, 2020, 45(2): 1818–1835.
[33] Hu H., Guo C., Cai H., et al., Dynamic characteristics of the recuperator thermal performance in a S-CO2 Brayton cycle. Energy, 2021, 214: 119017.
[34] Chu W., Li X., Ma T., et al., Experimental investigation on SCO2-water heat transfer characteristics in a printed circuit heat exchanger with straight channels. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 113: 184–194.
[35] Jiang Y., Liese E., Zitney S., et al., Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles. Applied Energy, 2018, 231: 1019–1032.
[36] Wang R., Wang X., Shu G., et al., Comparison of different load-following control strategies of a sCO2 Brayton cycle under full load range. Energy, 2022, 246: 123378.
[37] Wang X., Cai J., Lin Z., et al., Dynamic simulation study of the start-up and shutdown processes for a recompression CO2 Brayton cycle. Energy, 2022, 259: 124928.
文章导航

/