Aerodynamic Optimization and Flow Mechanism for a Compressor Cascade at Low Reynolds Number

  • LI Lin ,
  • ZHANG Jianshe ,
  • CHEN Caiyan ,
  • TAN Wei ,
  • ZHANG Yanfeng
展开
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Light-Duty Gas-Turbine, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Light-duty Gas-turbine, Beijing 100190, China

网络出版日期: 2025-01-09

基金资助

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the National Major Science and Technology Project of China (Grant No. 2017-II-0010-0024) and K.C. WONG Education Foundation (Grant No. GJTD-2019-09) for this project.

版权

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

Aerodynamic Optimization and Flow Mechanism for a Compressor Cascade at Low Reynolds Number

  • LI Lin ,
  • ZHANG Jianshe ,
  • CHEN Caiyan ,
  • TAN Wei ,
  • ZHANG Yanfeng
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Light-Duty Gas-Turbine, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Light-duty Gas-turbine, Beijing 100190, China

Online published: 2025-01-09

Supported by

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the National Major Science and Technology Project of China (Grant No. 2017-II-0010-0024) and K.C. WONG Education Foundation (Grant No. GJTD-2019-09) for this project.

Copyright

Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

摘要

低雷诺数效应是影响高空长航时无人机中压气机及其他主要部件性能的重要因素,为了改善高空低雷诺数条件下压气机流动状态并减少流动损失,本文提出了一种基于代理模型的气动优化流程。该流程结合了类别形状变换、拉丁超立方采样、梯度上升决策树和遗传算法,来优化了高亚声速压气机叶栅。研究验证了代理模型的准确性,并证实其可用于低雷诺数下的优化过程。而遗传算法的准确性在常见测试函数下也要高于其他算法。通过数值模拟验证了优化结果,并比较了优化前后的流动差异,特别是边界层内的流动。优化过程通过调整叶片型线,延迟吸力面上边界层转捩过程,将常见层流分离气泡中的湍流再附转变为层流再附,减少了分离泡湍流再附和尾缘湍流分离所引起的混合损失和尾涡损失,最终改善了压气机叶栅性能,减小了叶片后尾迹宽度。最终通过这一优化过程,在雷诺数为2.5×105、3.5×105和4.5×105时,总压损失系数分别降低了16.32%、20.76%和22.16%。

本文引用格式

LI Lin , ZHANG Jianshe , CHEN Caiyan , TAN Wei , ZHANG Yanfeng . Aerodynamic Optimization and Flow Mechanism for a Compressor Cascade at Low Reynolds Number[J]. 热科学学报, 2025 , 34(1) : 92 -109 . DOI: 10.1007/s11630-024-1970-8

Abstract

Low-Reynolds-number effect is an important factor affecting the performance of compressors and other main components of high-altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicles. To improve the flow condition and reduce flow loss under the condition of high altitude and low Reynolds number (Re), this paper proposes an optimization process based on a surrogate model, which combines the class-shape transformation method (CST), the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method, the light gradient-boosting machine algorithm (LightGBM), and a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize a high-subsonic compressor profile. The surrogate model is verified to be accurate and can be used in the optimization process. The accuracy of the GA is higher than the other algorithms under common test functions. The optimization results are verified by numerical simulation, and the flow differences before and after optimization are compared, especially the flow within the boundary layer. By changing the blade shape, the optimization process adjusts the loading distribution to delay the transition of the optimized blade on the suction surface, which changes the turbulent reattachment in the laminar separation bubble (LSB) into laminar reattachment. Therefore, the mixing loss induced by the turbulent reattachment of the LSB and the wake loss of turbulent separation at the trailing edge are significantly reduced, and the performance of the compressor profile is finally improved. In addition, turbulent separation of the optimized profile is delayed reducing the range of the wake region on the suction surface. By this optimization process, the reduction of total pressure loss coefficient at Re of 2.5×105, 3.5×105, and 4.5×105 are 16.32%, 20.76%, and 22.16%, respectively.

参考文献

[1] Luo C., Song L., Li J., et al., A study on multidisciplinary optimization of an axial compressor blade based on evolutionary algorithms. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, 134(5): 054501.
[2] Girardeau J., Pailhes J., Sebastian P., et al., Turbine blade cooling system optimization. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(6): 061020.
[3] Kenway G.K.W., Martins J.R.R.A., Multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the common research model wing. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(1): 113–128.
[4] Cheng J., Chen J., Xiang H., A surface parametric control and global optimization method for axial flow compressor blades. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(7): 1618–1634.
[5] Duan Y., Wu W., Zhang P., et al., Performance improvement of optimization solutions by POD-based data mining. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(4): 826–838.
[6] Xiang H., Chen J., Aerothermodynamics optimal design of a multistage axial compressor in a gas turbine using directly manipulated free-form deformation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 26: 101142.
[7] Forrester A.I.J., Keane A.J., Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2009, 45(1): 50–79.
[8] Han Z.H., Zhang K.S., Song W.P., et al., Optimization of active flow control over an airfoil using a surrogate-management framework. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(2): 603–612.
[9] Guo Z., Song L., Li J., et al., Research on meta-model based global design optimization and data mining methods. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 2015, Paper No: GT2015-42554, V02CT45A007.
[10] Liu Z., Liu X., Cai X., A new hybrid aerodynamic optimization framework based on differential evolution and invasive weed optimization. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(7): 1437–1448.
[11] Adjei R.A., Wang W., Liu Y., Aerodynamic design optimization of an axial flow compressor stator using parameterized free-form deformation. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2019, 141(10): 101015.
[12] Adjei R.A., Fan C., Wang W., et al., Multidisciplinary design optimization for performance improvement of an axial flow fan using free-form deformation. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2020, 143(1): 011003.
[13] Li J., Ji L., Zhou L., Design optimization of a blended blade and endwall in a compressor cascade. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2020, 142(2): 021003.
[14] Wang Z., Qu F., Wang Y., et al., Research on the lean and swept optimization of a single stage axial compressor. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 15(1): 142–163.
[15] Du Q., Li Y., Yang L., et al., Performance prediction and design optimization of turbine blade profile with deep learning method. Energy, 2022, 254: 124351.
[16] Du Q., Yang L., Li L., et al., Aerodynamic design and optimization of blade end wall profile of turbomachinery based on series convolutional neural network. Energy, 2022, 244: 122617.
[17] Vincekovic L., John A., Qin N., et al., Exploring topology optimization for high pressure turbine blade tips. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2022, 144(7): 071013.
[18] Verstraete T., Amaral S., Van den Braembussche R., et al., Design and optimization of the internal cooling channels of a high pressure turbine blade—Part II: Optimization. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 132(2): 021014.
[19] De Maesschalck C., Lavagnoli S., Paniagua G., Blade tip shape optimization for enhanced turbine aerothermal performance. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 136(4): 041016.
[20] Dow E.A., Wang Q., The implications of tolerance optimization on compressor blade design. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 137(10): 101008.
[21] Luo J., Chen Z., Zheng Y., A gradient-based method assisted by surrogate model for robust optimization of turbomachinery blades. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(10): 1–7.
[22] Sun J., Ottavy X., Liu Y., et al., Corner separation control by optimizing blade end slots in a linear compressor cascade. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 114: 106737.
[23] Luo J., Zhou C., Liu F., Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 136(5): 051005.
[24] He L., Wang D.X., Concurrent blade aerodynamic-aero-elastic design optimization using adjoint method. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2010, 133(1): 011021.
[25] Zhang Z.Q., Li P.J., Li Q.K., et al., Dynamic machine learning global optimization algorithm and its application to aerodynamics. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2023, 39(4): 524–539.
[26] Li L., Tan W., Zhang J., et al., Unsteady effects of wake on downstream rotor at low Reynolds numbers. Energies, 2022, 15(18): 6692.
[27] Kulfan B., Bussoletti J., “Fundamental” parameteric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes. 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2006, Paper No: AIAA 2006-6948.
[28] Stein M., Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics, 1987, 29(2): 143–151.
[29] Walker G.J., Observations of separated laminar flow on axial compressor blading. Proceedings of the ASME 1975 International Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show, 1975, Paper No: 75-GT-63, V01BT02A001.
文章导航

/